Aasia Bibi ruling: Pakistan’s Christians still need protection from “blasphemy” accusations

The decision of Pakistan’s Supreme Court to acquit Aasia Bibi of false charges of “blasphemy” is a courageous verdict in a country where the mere accusation of “blasphemy” is enough to incite vigilante killing.

But it would be misleading to claim, as Amnesty International and others have, that this is a “landmark ruling” that will improve the plight of Pakistan’s Christian minority – or even the many Muslims – who are falsely accused of defiling the name of Muhammad.

It remains a crime under section 295-C of the Pakistan Penal Code and carries a mandatory death penalty. Those who oppose Pakistan’s “blasphemy” laws can themselves be accused of “blasphemy”.

Contradictory witness statements meant evidence against Aasia Bibi was not credible

The judgment is based on a mixture of sharia and Western-based law. But it is the latter, particularly the law of evidence, that has ultimately prevailed. The judges found that the massive contradictions in the statements of prosecution witnesses meant that they could not be considered “truthful witnesses”. There were significant discrepancies as to the place, number of persons present (ranging between 100 and 2,000) and even the date of a village meeting when Asia Bibi was alleged to have confessed to “blasphemy”.

Read the full story at Barnabas Aid. 
Up Next

A billionaire's dying wish: A $10 million prize to fight brain diseases

Read Now
Editor's note: Stories appearing on NCF's website from third-party contributors are intended for informational purposes only, and we do not endorse or approve the content, services, products, or theological teachings they contain. Any questions or concerns may be directed to the original publisher of such third-party content.

Sign up for our
Saturday 7 email digest

Join close to 50,000 subscribers who receive our email digest of
the week's top stories from We call it Saturday 7.

Read our privacy policy